Friday, July 12, 2013

What Killed Aiyana Stanley-Jones?

What Killed Aiyana Stanley-Jones? is an insight into the current state of affairs in the city of Detroit. It starts off with the death of Aiyana, an innocent girl shot on May 16, 2011 by the police in their efforts to catch murderer Chauncey Owens. The police broke in and shot without reason. They then attempted covering up the truth. Thus begins Charlie LeDuff’s essay in which he highlights the murders and corruption that take place on a daily basis Detroit. He describes the city’s constant crimes, failing police system, ineffective education system, and the poverty in which most people live in.
Written for Mother Jones magazine, LeDuff proves his credibility through providing facts about the city that he clearly spent time to scrounge around for. Many of LeDuff’s stories and facts are pulled through interviews with police or people who live and work in Detroit. Through illustrating the hopeless state Detroit is in, LeDuff’s purpose is to bring attention to the fact that Detroit and its people need help. Due to the fact that this essay was published in Mother Jones, a political and economic magazine, LeDuff’s target audience is most likely any educated middle class or high class citizen outside of Detroit.
Pathos is the most common rhetorical device that LeDuff utilizes. He does so through quotes of family of those murdered, and other citizens of Detroit. For example, LeDuff includes a quote from Aiyana’s father; he says, “I can accept the shooting was a mistake…but I can’t accept it because they lied about it,” (LeDuff 121). Also, LeDuff goes to great lengths to describe the impact these murders have on the family and the community. He describes Aiyana’s funeral through many details: “Aiyana’s pink-robed body was carried away by a horse-drawn carriage…the same carriage that…had taken the body of Rosa Parks to Woodlawn Cemetary” (LeDuff 122).

His use of pathos is well placed, and achieves its desired effect; thus, LeDuff does achieve his purpose of alerting the people who read this essay of the tragedy that is now the story of Detroit. However, it is doubtful that readers will take more action than just shaking their head and going on about their day.


No comments:

Post a Comment